^ Somebody has been playing to much Starcraft!
However, i believe that England shouldn't have helped USA in the Iraq war it was utterly pointless, and we are losing our soldiers, troops, Specialists to another country that never even fought for us or USA! I say let them do their own battles! We did so!

I couldn't disagree more with that statement Combo, we should think of the world as a global co-operative community instead of the antiquated view of "us and them" and we might just move forward as a species. That said, your more than entitled to your opinion, we shall beg to differ.

i know how to end his rouge bullying spree - get him to run towards one of those american convoys, they'll gun him down, serves the fat bully right, in my opinion....i hate gangsters, and i hate bullies :D

Even though I don't believe in the war. Your justification is insanely flawed. The US HAS helped Britain and Europe many a times ww1,ww2. Don't say we've never done anything to help.


But can't we just have Fucking peace already?

yes, usa usually tends to come "helping" right after the war itself is starting to settle down

In ww1 the USA didn't come in until late but it sent a lot of aid and support through troops too the other Allies. WW2 we also came in late but still have a higher military casualty number higher then the United Kingdom and many other of the major ciountries involved in the war. Revionist history much R.U.S.S.?

+the fact that they had higher casualties than uk just tells about how lame the us troops were

also, i love how you refer to ww1/ww2 us troops as "we". even more ridiculous than when someone says "we won the cup" in olympic games

i dont get why one of the kids just runs a few meters away from the bully and then run at thee bully gaining speed and spear tackeling him

Yeah, US troops sucked. That makes sense. The simple fact of the war is that it would not of been won without American Support. I am not saying you need to know your role. I am saying your history revisionism is a joke. The russians at the rate they were going would of been extinct by the end and would of HAD to surrender if the war went much longer. You can't sustain a war effort when more then 12 percent of your entire population is dead as a result. Thus without the American's along with the rest of the allies the war would of turned much differently, I'm not saying go america but the idea that one of the closest wars in history could of been won without America is absurd.

WW2 could have been won without America, it is possible, Russia would have got back up during Winter when the Werschsat or whatever, didn't have the right equipment or supplies during Winter, the Soviets did, thus getting them out of their country, and as for Britian, the closest that the Germans have either got to England was the Isle of White i think or is it Isle of Man??? Without America in WW2, there could have been more or less Casutalies it depends, but then again, you can't really say, "Oh Britian did it all" or "Without America, the rest of the worlds population couldn't wipe its ass clean without them teaching people" or "Russia would have been attacked by the Chinese without France" etcetcetc.
WW2 would and could be either sides, due to many different events and factors!