rlbell |
23-01-2006 03:07 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by ReamusLQ@Jan 23 2006, 03:15 PM
I'm always weary of religion bashing sites, mainly because it's hard to differentiate between ones that are only speaking lies, and ones are are actually telling the truth.
I run into a lot of Anti-Mormon websites all the time, most of which are either exagerations on the truth, things taken out of context, or simply not true. I always sites that speak badly of religions (no matter how bizzare they may seem) with a grain of salt, so I usually try to talk to a member of the religion directly. With Scientology however, this is very hard to do beacuse they get very very very very very very very secretive. My friend used to talk to me about what he knew, but now he won't really talk about it at all.
|
Scientology is like that. It is so wierd that you have to assume that the statements are lies. However, if you dig a little deeper, it gets too wierd for anyone to make up this stuff. The OT3 account of the Xenu incident is available on the web, as a scan of Hubbard's original handwritten copy. We know that it is in Hubbard's hand, because CoS lawyers have been complaining about it violating copyright. Unfortunately for them, it is not the complete OT3 document, so webbing it falls under the fair use of quoting sections of a larger work for the purposes of criticism.
Scientologists do not talk to non-scientologists, all that much. Even knowing someone who is not a scientologist can be expensive. If a scientologist knows someone who expresses doubts about scientology, it can be a cause for failure to make case gain, which costs more money to deal with by $125/hour auditing. The only way to stop a doubting acqaintance from costing a scientologist thousands of dollars is to disconnect from them.
Scientology practices work (or so Hubbard would have people believe), so if you do a rundown and are not a more able person as a result of it, it is because of some buried incident that you have not admitted, even to yourself. The only way to handle it is to get enough auditting to uncover the incident and then redo the rundown (at the higher levels, this runs to hundreds of thousands of dollars). The point of this is that Scientology maintains that all of your problems with scientology are your own fault, and the only way to handle it is to spend even more money.
Why do cults flourish and why do so many actors and musicians flock to scientology? Some people have a positive need for attention. You show up at a scientology org and you are immediately lavished with attention. If you are not an attention junkie, you run away (screaming is optional). If you are an attention junkie, the initial highs of attention are of a low enough cost that you keep coming back. But the longer you are there, the more they extort out of you for each hit of attention. Scientology specifically attempts to recruit celebreties for two reasons: first because these people are more likely to be attention junkies than non-celebreties, and second, people pay attention to what celebrities say, no matter how unlikely it is for them to actually understand what they are talking about.
|