| El Quia |
07-01-2010 08:40 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saccade
(Post 392888)
Her hair is made of plastic.
She's the type of chick that I would date for a few weeks, then get bored of her very quickly.
Though she could make sand pictures from my dandruff, so it'd be a give and take relationship... It may work...
it is pretty awesome, tho. She must've practiced that a lot.
[can I take my xmas hat off yet?]
[ed]
One thing I've never understood is how adding a tear under the eye to a portrait always makes people say "it's so beautiful"...
|
Because we all have a little emo inside.
:eww:
But seriously, it gets on my nerves when people adds just sad things, horrible things or just stupid brutal things as a freaking low punch to then say "now I am all artsy pansy". And people say "oh, that is high art, it made me feel like crap" Bullsh*t, I say. Sure, art can make you feel uncomfortable and stuff, but it is not showing you ten minutes of an unedited anal rape scene on screen (damn you, stupid "Irréversible" movie) what make a work of art "moving" or "deep", that is just a cheap move. But it seems that adding an scene of sexual violence, or "a tear jerking moment" or any stock prefabricated crap turns you into an artist. It doesn't work that way.
Emotional manipulation is common in art, but the problem is when you just throw easy disturbing scenes as a cheap way of moving your audience. That has no merit, it's like dropping LSD in the drinks of the people assisting to a picture exhibition and then have them praising the weird way in which colors played amongst themselves.
Sorry for the rant.
And the video was interesting, I liked it. |
