War never changes n' shit
 

I gots a question: if you had to choose between a Zombocalypse and a Nuclear Apocalypse (fallout/mad max) to live in, which would you choose and why?

Nuclear apocalypse.

Why? Fallout :thumbs:

i chose fallout for this simple reason;

Less threats. There could be thousands of zombies ina single area, where as in the Nuclear world you'll only have a few raiders or something. Sure, radiation would be there and in the real world none of us (or atleast, you gusy that live in cities) would live long enough to even see the effects of radioactive fallout, but for smaller populated areas liek my town i'd get to see general anarchy take over. Remember, we'd live in the immidiate aftermath of world War 3, not years later like the Fallout games!

No love for the stiffs :(

If the bombs would drop, the future might not, and probably wont be, anything like Mad Max or Fallout.

Go see a film called "Threads". I've heard its pretty horrifying.

This is pretty much choosing weither you'd like to freeze to death or be burned to death. Both are unpleasant as heck, and you don't what 'em to happen.

That aside, a nuclear apoc would be easier to survive in.

Well, not really, radiactivity and nuclear winter sucks... but at least, the odds are that your dead would be a lot more impersonal than in a zombie apocalypse.. I mean, I would prefer to die because of impersonal radiation poisoning or out of hunger than being devoured by a ravenous zombie!

fallout! moar meat on some people!

Zombi-pocalypse for me.

No radioactivity, plenty of food, fuel and water for survival. Also, there's a rather clear end-game... get rid of the zombies, and the world is okay again.

Nukes covering everything would kinda spoil the earth a bit, doncha think?

I voted for Nuclear apocalypse but I now realise that I'd prefer a zombie one. I've always wanted to loot a supermarket in a zombie apocalypse (Cliched much?).