Some of these postings seem a bit hypocritical.
Quote:
RE: Retailers that count:
Quote:
|
"Generally only established merchants selling new copies of software are accepted"
|
 k:
"So you are saying that i can buy a brand new game from a whole saler and sell it off brand new without the permission of, say, blizzard for example? "
Quote:
|
This is a common business practice. Nothing odd there. It's simply the way businesses operate.
|
:not_ok:
RE: Abandonwares Legal Staus
Quote:
|
....abandonware is illegal to begin with
|
k:
Followed BY:
Quote:
|
abandonware has no legal status
|
:not_ok:
RE: Grand Theft Auto
Quote:
|
The site is kind of a preservatory for titles that are impossible to acquire otherwise.
|
k:
Quote:
|
I suspect it's on the site because it's popular
|
:not_ok:
|
N.B. GTA is not Freeware the EULA prohibits re-ditribution. :whistle:
No offence Timpsi, but none of us are obviously involved in the decision making processes of Abandonia. My original posting was to try and find the reasoning behind the choice of games for the site.
Although I bow down to your superhero like powers of annoying CDAccess
