21-12-2005, 04:30 PM
|
#1 | ||
    Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Opole, Poland
Posts: 14,276
|
I'm currently building a machine for a) text-editing and B) DOS gaming. The first purpose will be fulfilled easily enough by Windows 98, but I am a bit unsure which version of DOS to use (note: it's not a dual-boot system, DOS will run from a completely different HDD).
So, should I use Dos 6.2, 7.1 or the FreeDos thingy? What are the points for and against each of th4ese choices? (note: I have already got a full CD copy of DOS 7.1)
__________________
 "God. Can't you people see I'm trying to commit a crime against science and nature here?" -- Reed Richards |
||
|
|
|
21-12-2005, 07:58 PM
|
#2 | ||
 Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
Posts: 1,508
|
Dos 6.2 is the most 'pure' DOS of them all and will give no compatibility problems. DOS 7.1 is probably more or less covered in your Win98 installation. I am however , very charmed by FreeDOS (mostly because I'm an Open Source evangelist). Most games seem to run in FreeDOS without any problems. FreeDOS is also a true 32-bit OS, which should have superior memory managment and less of the LMB problems the 'real' DOS had.
|
||
|
|
|
|
21-12-2005, 08:22 PM
|
#3 | ||
  Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 476
|
I'd go for the "pure" 6.22, too. Although FreeDOS seems very good. Maybe those people learned from the mistakes Microsoft made. btw, is FreeDOS 100% compatible with MS-DOS?
|
||
|
|
|
|
23-12-2005, 07:16 AM
|
#4 | ||
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
Posts: 1,508
|
Check out freedos.sourceforge.net
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
05-01-2006, 06:08 AM
|
#5 | ||
 Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 890
|
Go for dos7.10 it is still original dos and is quiet good.
|
||
|
|
|
|
13-01-2006, 08:20 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 476
|
I tried 7.1 once, I deleted it immediately. It just didn't feel like DOS anymore.
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-01-2006, 05:29 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Opole, Poland
Posts: 14,276
|
Gone through some trouble with the thing. I'll see if I could switch to FreeDos, at the moment it's Dos 7.1
__________________
"God. Can't you people see I'm trying to commit a crime against science and nature here?" -- Reed Richards |
||
|
|
|
|
17-01-2006, 12:31 PM
|
#8 | ||
 Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ,
Posts: 21
|
Just curious:
was DOS 7.1 ever available as a standalone product? I can only remember it being once bundeled with Windows (95? 98? ME? ,don't know). Edit: erm, are we talking about MS DOS or PC DOS (Caldera)? |
||
|
|
|
|
18-01-2006, 05:16 PM
|
#9 | ||
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Opole, Poland
Posts: 14,276
|
Windows 95 had Dos 6, AFAIK.
Windows 98 had Dos 7. I've got a stand-alone MS-DOS 7.1 right in front of me.
__________________
"God. Can't you people see I'm trying to commit a crime against science and nature here?" -- Reed Richards |
||
|
|
|
|
11-06-2006, 08:37 AM
|
#10 | ||
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 476
|
I think some people 'freed' it and made it available on the internet. You know, disk images and like that.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Has Anybody Tried Virtual Pc (vmware) + Freedos | wgan | Tech Corner | 3 | 30-07-2006 09:31 AM |
| Ms Virtual Pc 2004 With Freedos | rabadi | General compatibility fixes | 18 | 11-05-2006 01:17 AM |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
||
Linear Mode
