«

[Tom Henrik]

Most of you know of this topic, where the male population of this forum has taken it upon themselves to govern the abortion issue. Naturally, men won't have to ever go through with a birth and/or an abortion, but they insist on portraying themselves as leading experts on the subject... could be due to hormones, I don't know.

Now then, as we all know getting pregnant involves two people of opposite genders (sperm banks have no place in this topic). While the other topic is only related to women having sex just for the heck of things, and not a single thought is given to the male, I have opened this topic where women can discuss the best solutions to men having casual sex without protection.

And as a women getting pregnant as result of an accident (there is no 100% secure way to protect oneself during sex) have no choice but to darn well have that baby, I believe that the guy involved in the conception should have no choice but to undergo a vasectomy. That should teach them both, I say.

And remember, this is a girls only topic, men should just be ignored in this discussion. Just as women are more or less ignored in the other topic.

This is a woman's world. Have fun, girls :Tom:

[taikara]

I am a huge supporter of vasectomy as a method of birth control. It's nearly 100% effective, and unlike tubal ligation (the female version), there are few potential complications to a reversal process if the couple chooses to have children.

In addition, it's cheap (and in the US, free to many people) to undergo a vasectomy, whereas the reversal process costs thousands - which would ensure a stable financial environment in which to raise a child.

Also, it's rarely the male who chooses to have a child, and were he willing to undergo the process of reversal, you could be absolutely certain he was committed to raising a child and committing to a family.

I wish men were required to get them, it would definitely solve much of the abortion issue, with no moral issues regarding killing human beings, etc.

And I am 100% serious.

[Fruit Pie Jones]

I am a huge supporter of vasectomy as a method of birth control.

I'm not only a supporter; I'm a participant.

In addition, it's cheap (and in the US, free to many people)

Correct. I'm pretty sure my company's insurance paid for most of it in my case, and even if they hadn't, it wouldn't have been very expensive at all.

Incidentally, I fear that this thread will deteriorate even more quickly than That Other One.

[Tom Henrik]

I just have to say this as well;
(Girls, feel free to ignore me )


Men who has undergone a vasectomy are often more calm and mellow. Just like male cats who are neutered.

So giving men a vasectomy (by law) could actually make this world a calmer place

[taikara]

Originally posted by Fruit Pie Jones@Sep 22 2005, 07:18 PM
I'm not only a supporter; I'm a participant.

Yay! :Brain:

We must start a crusade for more intelligent decisions such as these!

[Sebatianos]

I know it says girls only, so I hope I won't offend anyone by posting here :bleh:

I agree to it. If a man wants to have casual sex without offering commitment - he should be vasectomized. That would solve many problems!

So the men who are waiting for the right one and are really willing ot comit and start a family would not even need it - but could still have it when they decide they would not have any more children (would not impregnate any more women).

And this would definetly decrees the overpopulation. Although I don't really see most men agree to it - but then again - most wouldn't really see the true benefits (those might convince them).

[Tom Henrik]

Originally posted by Sebatianos@Sep 22 2005, 07:24 PM
And this would definetly decrees the overpopulation. Although I don't really see most men agree to it - but then again - most wouldn't really see the true benefits (those might convince them).

Luckily this isn't up to the males.

Girls see more than enough benefits to issue it as a law, just as many men see enough reasons to issue a law about abortions.

So we should be thankful that the women are responsible for the sperms

[Kon-Tiki]

Some guys should just be neutred, like those Limburgers from above my student room, back in the days. Rowdy bunch, flinging butter and ketchup at each other, playing soccer with a glass bottle in the corridor in the middle of the night, bonking on each other's doors for four hours, yelling "OPEN UP! COME ON, OPEN UP!", at night, and finding it necessary to move their furniture while people below them're trying to study for their exams.

That's to sketch their intelligence and behaviour. It was often that you could hear them help a piss-drunk girl up to their rooms, then the day after, hear her leave again, never to hear her in those halls again. That usually pissed me off so badly. Who knows what those girls ended up with, after spending a night with such retards? I seriously believe such people ought to be neutered. 't Would solve alot of problems.

[taikara]

And as I mentioned, unlike abortion, it carries no moral debate regarding where life begins, and murder and whatnot.

I'd personally rather force men to get a vasectomy than force women to carry a child they didn't want.

There are less harmful consequences in general to forcing men to get a vasectomy, and you can be sure that children that are born are WANTED.

But realistically, I wouldn't vote for a law that required anyone to do anything with their bodies they didn't want to do... it's just that were I forced to choose between the two, I think that preventing unwanted pregnancies across the board is more humane than forcing someone to have a child they never wanted.

And guys, from what I hear, vasectomies are not so bad, recovery-wise, with no negative side effects regarding the actual act of sex.

[Sebatianos]

And yet another thing to be said for it.

Most preists in ancient India have suposedly undergon a very similar procedure, because the orgasms without the loss of sperm were believed to renew the brain cells.

I don't know if that can be done - I think brain-cells can't really be renewed, but hey - if it's true having casual sex would make you smarter k:

But just a small hint Tom - although I'm guessing your initial idea was to show men how it would be like if the other gender was to decide upon a thing like this (sort of a payback for men deciding about abortion) I'd like to remind that the laws (although I generally disagree with them - since they tend to be absolute) are being passed by the entire body of the population. So it wasn't only men who passed the abortion laws :whistle:

EDIT:

And guys, from what I hear, vasectomies are not so bad, recovery-wise, with no negative side effects regarding the actual act of sex.

Actually the effects regarding the act of sex are positive - longer lasting - getting more pleasure (for both participents), longer lasting erections... At least thats what research proves (haven't had one done on myself yet - so I can't tell you from my personal experience).