«

[TaloN]

how about if people want to reviw the game htey just put it in the games forum posting,.,,

[wormpaul]

Nah..

When doing like this people will get more motivated for old reviews..

Better concentrate on new ones k:

[Rogue]

When you grow up, you'll figure it out for us. :whistle: LOL

Why have one, when you can have many good things?

[wormpaul]

i`m grown up know.

Almost getting childs at this forum k:

[Tom Henrik]

Get back on topic, people.

[Rogue]

:Tom:


What's your opinion :Tom: ?

[Tom Henrik]

More work = more hazzle = more problems.

If a review stinks, then whoever is unhappy should PM the reviewer and asking if they are allowed to make another review for the game.

[Rogue]

So you don't believe gamespot's reader review is worth checking?

Nothing has to be wrong with main review; you just can have different opinion, and might like to point them.

I believe that there is only more work to program this, and I can understand that programmers do not have enough time.

But this idea is great, even if don't do it.

[Unknown Hero]

There you go. I made a poll, because I think we all should vote. My vote goes to 'Yes, I'm supporting this idea.'
http://www.abandonia.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=4427

[Kon-Tiki]

I agree with Seb and Mad-E-Fact. There're too many games that still need a review. Why focus on the games that're already reviewed then? Seb's idea of making a list for games that need to be re-reviewed, like the one 'bout the screenshots, should take care of the crappy reviews. Starting multiple reviews for a game seems like putting a stop to adding quality games to Abandonia's database and just bloating the popular games, while those games that could be awesome too but have a lacking review will still stay out in the cold.