Quote:
Originally posted by Indignus IV@May 31 2005, 01:18 AM
IT was very clever. Made me laugh. Thanks!
Now I have to get all down and dirty with it: I think that guy (who wrote the article) was putting too much pressure on the gaming corporations. Don't we all want to fix the bitty little problems in our games? Dont we all want a realistic, human-like, intelligent game? WE all do. But its not important enough for us to really care. I think this guy is way too serious about the little problems which we encounter now and then. Ive had all the same problems in the past. But I dont let it all ruin my gaming experience completely. Also, these game upgrades are very advanced and expensive for game corporations to develop. AI which learns? Dont make me laugh. The hard-drive that kind of program would take up is unthinkable. But maybe in the future we can improve these little, annoying chips on our collective shoulder. 
|
real A.I would take up a lot of processing power, and need a lot more development work.
bots in multiplayer scenarios show how hard it is to get realistic behaviour!
i think they could work on better 'tricks' that wouldnt be so demanding. like having them duck into cover shouldnt be THAT hard to pull off. the enemies in original half life have a decent go at doing that. he's right to be annoyed that modern games sometimes just have 'rambo' enemies