First of all, it seems to me that you're trying to apply the big bang theory on a computer, and seeing that it can't be done you use that as proof against the big bang ((Edit: proof that there must be a maker, to be correct). You can not compare a computer with the universe, since you (or anybody else) don't know enough about the qualities óf the universe to do that. What if the universe is infinate? It's not a closed system then, and it can't be said to have an outside.
Besides, you can argue that the computer is simply a byproduct of nature, and that the maker of a cell (or whatever) is simply the process that creates that cell (in the same way that mankind is only the catalyst that helps make computers).
Just my two cents.
|