View Single Post
Old 20-06-2005, 01:30 PM   #161
Sly
Newbie

 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by R Havell@Jun 20 2005, 07:54 AM
@Sly, why do you choose to take some aspects of science to the letter to support your point (like the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics) but choose to completely disregard other aspects that disprove it (like the carbon dating of rocks and human remains)?

EDIT: And you could carry out the cat experiment in real life but animal rights groups would probably object
Carbon dating? You have got to be kidding me. It's a waste of time. That one can be ripped to shreds in 5 minutes.

Its entire premise is based on two faulty assumptions...

1) The amount of carbon-14 in the atmosphere has always been constant
2) and its rate of decay has always been constant.

Sly is offline                         Send a private message to Sly