That's all well and good, but if he claims that this version is "better than it's source material", he should probably go about telling us how, as opposed to just recapping the source material and completly dismissing his opening statement. I think it's fair to say we've all played Pac-Man and, perhaps more importantly, could find versions of it with a nominal amount of effort if we wanted to do so again, so for what reasons would I be tempted to play this one that, by his account, is exactly the same as any other?
Basically what I'm trying to say (and in reference to your post, Sebatianos) is that he didn't think his cunning plan all the way through.
Also, an internal clock, which is nothing more than an application designed to allow the basic game to be ran as it was intended, is not an improvement on the source material, it's a means to keep it exactly as it is. But hey, a slight alteration of the maze design...RAD!
