Quote:
Originally posted by dr_doom@Dec 19 2005, 04:43 AM
Quote:
|
I'll go with the hardcore system, the DS.
|
sure, if your idea of a hardcore system is one with, at best, mediocre graphics and again, at best, mediocre games, go out and buy yourself a nintendo DS. to me, though, the PSP just has more appealing games and features that wont even compare to the DS. I would much rather play GTA:LCS, Infected, Socom (online with up to 16 players = sweeet!), burnout legends, lumines, Prince of Persia, ridge racer, and many others over the weak games that the DS has to offer. The fact that i can also watch movies, play music, view pictures, and surf the internet is just icing on the cake.
oh, on all the games that were on both your "hardcore system" and the psp, the psp version totally OWNED the ds version. i just dont see how that system can be cosidered hard core, when almost all it has is lame games. In fact, pretty much all of the good DS games were games made by nintendo, all third party games bombed. not true for the psp, not true at all. sooo yeah.
|
Yes, but that mindset reminds me of the type of casual gamer depicted in so many gaming webcomics, complete with baseball cap and "l33t" tee-shirt.
I'm sorta a stickler for innovation, and a stylus versus a super nintendo control scheme (Don't forget to pay respects to Nintendo for that)? Meh, I'll stick with the innovator. I've played GTA, I don't need to carry it around in my pocket, I'd rather pet the fake dog.
USD player?! Email!?!! COOL! It's almost as great as my computer!!
As for the graphics arguement, I just have one inquiery: Are you serious? I thought the "It's pretty" point was a last ditch effort made by most modern lacklustre developers.
Quote:
|
and features that wont even compare to the DS.
|
But you are correct there. Glad you see my side of the debate.