Quote:
Originally posted by *Happy*+Nov 2 2005, 01:08 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (*Happy* @ Nov 2 2005, 01:08 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Gamefreak@Nov 2 2005, 12:49 PM
Sequels are almost always worse than the first part that started them. I read enough negative reviews of Return to Krondor, so I didn't get it earlier where I intended to. It's just too bad that there wasn't a worthy successor for Betrayal at Krondor, everytime I finished it I wished it would continue in another game...
|
I agree completely.
Also, it's terrible how most RPGs from the year 2000 onwards really lack plot and inspired writing. I'm hard pressed to find even a "spiritual" successor to BaK. [/b][/quote]
Semi-
There is some very strange tendency going on in modern game world. In my point of view, modern RPGs are all getting dumber and they lack substance. On the other hand, surprisingly enough, FPS are getting more elaborate and... well... atmospheric with a lot of good RPG traits. Anybody played F.E.A.R? Although it's a completely different genre, the strength and impresiveness of plotline are nearly the same as in BaK.