Quote:
Originally posted by Sebatianos@Apr 17 2006, 09:01 AM
Iran isn't developing nuclear weapens (according to them theyre not developing them at all) to attack the USA. I think only the USA did develop nuclear weapons to attack another country - Japan (and at the same time show the world that they have this powerful new weapon).
All the other countries were developing it to keep what they feel the balance of power, which unfortunately is a late 19th early 20th century model of keeping peace, but resulted in the first world war.
All the countries should dispose of their nuclear arsenal - no more nukes anywhere!
|
Opps i didnt see last posts
To add some data, Iran hasnt any long, medium or short range ballistic missile to carry nuclear heads denveloped. This is the way to say the world "i got nukes" to lauch a medium range missile with nuclear warheadr capacity (well USA skipped the point of dont load the "missile" or bomb still no american missile in 1945/6).
About the Iran bomb, they are in the step of preparate the enriched(i dont know if its tha same that "enriquecido" in spanish) Uranium. They improved the Uranium in 3.31%. This is also need to make civil use of nuclear power but the Uranium for civil use never can go over a top (i dont remember it 20% maybe). Also this top is more political than fisical, u cannt make a bomb with less of 20% of imporvement in the Uranium.
Last one, UN consider that the iran isntallations are secure for more than 15% of improvement(1998 inspection). So, according to last if Iran go over 15% radiation will affect the area next to the nuclear research plant.