[laiocfar]

I think that both games Civ III should have be better, it is too similar to Civ II and new features arent so new. It is most like an update of graphics and sound. There are some big changes as strategic resources but they didnt build a new game from these good ideas, they pasted them in this better Civ II and they final product lacks of internal armony. Example: it ends beign better to build mines in plains ar start of games or the game turned more complex in diplomacy and the AI acts as always or the war should become more strategic but we always end fighting against the hordes of the AI.