<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(troop18546 @ Sep 16 2006, 05:48 PM) [snapback]255478[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
|
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Blood-Pigggy @ Sep 16 2006, 10:14 PM) [snapback]255448[/snapback]
|
Quote:
No that sucks.
But something about San Andreas tells me that those 674 hours the stats menu gives me didn't go wasted into a game that "sucks".
[/b]
|
Let me think... hmm... GTA:SA differences from GTA:3 - Umm... not that much? BTW the ultimate GTA WAS GTA3. Without no stuinking little bonus crap, it rocked the house with one of the best chars ever made (the player). GTA:SA is so Pyder Diddy, that I dropped playing the sissy negro from SA months ago.
Just my opinion, I am entitled to it y'know.
[/b][/quote]
Racist.
San Andreas was SO much better than all the other games, really. I can't go back to any of the other games, I mean, no swimming? No stats? No customization? No vehicle modding? No buying houses? (only gaining them from missions) No open areas? No manual aim? No fighting styles? No dual wield? No sneaking? No bicycles? No mission variety? No tangible story with feeling characters?
Hell, even the soundtrack is better.
Seriously, how can you put a game like SA on the block without throwing flack at stuff like True Crime: New York City?
It's virtually impossible for ANY Grand Theft Auto fan to return back to the older games, there's just so much stuff that makes SA better.