<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(gregor @ Jan 5 2007, 10:34 AM) [snapback]273400[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
Some games had issues with FAT 32. and some had their fixes just recenlty (after being "abandonded", hacked and fixed)
as for the boot loader as i know the DOS had something you could set up so it asked you when computer loaded which system and settings you want to initiate. only a few command lines were added into autoexec.bat & config.sys files. same thing is in Windows if you press the F5 key after startup.
i used to use LILO cause i had Linux installed (i actually still have the Linux but it doens't work with new graphics card). i manged to destroy it.  so i can't say a lot about it. only the interface was neat and shinny 
for DOS games in my opinion it is better to install FAT 16. they were made for those systems anyway (file names with 8 letters+3 letters extension). WIN 95 works good with DOS 6.22 and FAT 16.
BTW did you give any thought to virus protection in your guide? viruses were much more common in DOS and WIN 95 than they are now.
[/b]
|
Okay, I'm not sure yet wether to use FAT-32 or FAT-16, but I doubt I'll ever go beyond 1.5GB Harddrives, and I hate LFN (big fan of 8-character names), but I am pretty sure that I will use FreeDOS.
Another idea just came to my mind - how about using small (200-800MB) HDs for the OS itself and keeping the software etc. on a dedicated HD? Can anyone recommend/advise against this?
As for virus protection, I was going to use F-Prot, but if anyone has a better suggestion, please share it.
Right now, trying to use Linux as secondary OS seems futile on that kind of system, but I'll keep looking into it. Does anyone know the minimum requirements for Fluxbox?