I just made an easy crainiac, fight the hard crainiac, by mistake. Guess who won, the stupid one- the easy crainiac. I think thats the main flaw in the game the Brainiac's AI, he is so stupid. He only attacks never thinks what the consequences will be, he never thinks of defensive moves, he might hop with a pawn and sometimes open holes with 6 pawns around them, he also doesn't know that hoping and eating two is quite the same as cloning and eating only one.
But it's terribly fun to fight against a friend, and it can be hard then.
Hexxagon II has nothing new but graphics? Thats annoying. Also the graphics in Hexxagon I are nicer, the board might be a bit boring but at list the background is a bit intresting, at list more then in II. Also I like the pearls and rubies better then the antidotes and germs, don't know why but I think they look better.
I just made an easy crainiac, fight the hard crainiac, by mistake. Guess who won, the stupid one- the easy crainiac. I think thats the main flaw in the game the Brainiac's AI, he is so stupid. He only attacks never thinks what the consequences will be, he never thinks of defensive moves, he might hop with a pawn and sometimes open holes with 6 pawns around them, he also doesn't know that hoping and eating two is quite the same as cloning and eating only one.
But it's terribly fun to fight against a friend, and it can be hard then.
Hexxagon II has nothing new but graphics? Thats annoying. Also the graphics in Hexxagon I are nicer, the board might be a bit boring but at list the background is a bit intresting, at list more then in II. Also I like the pearls and rubies better then the antidotes and germs, don't know why but I think they look better.
|