I partially disagree. A revolutionary game can be called so because of the new concept everyone follows I believe. A revolution spawns new ideas, not more revenue.
I said partially, coz if a game is a huge success without bringing any new ideas to the industry, chances are other game developers copy that game and so we get a new line of games. The thing here is: Can that be called a revolution when nothing has changed? I don't know.
__________________
Je Suis Charlie
|