Concerning ISP's involvement
EDITED: Actually, The service provider is a field I have researched and wrote about.
Nearly all ISP's have a service and mission statement, which will include these lines; We are a public Service Provider. Our aim is to provide a secure connection to media content.
I have two phone calls stating: they are a convenience and a luxury service provider.
What this clearly means, is your ISP should pay for a secure service and protect the customer, which is included in the fee to said customer. i.e. We, the end-users, should never have to pay for anti-viral software, subscriptions to parental controls, or any other 3rd party protection, while being provided a secure public service by an ISP.
In a nutshell, ISP's claims, demand they pay for Norton, not you and I.
This translates to, The very same ISP, should be protecting all sides, including the copyright holder and if necessary, the ISP should also provide insurances.
Further translation: Higher bill from your ISP.
Last edited by CrybKeeper; 22-05-2009 at 11:04 PM.
|