Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthHelmet86
You didn't qoute Yoga...you qouted someone else and their comments about how they play the game. And Fallout is just as much about gun fights as it is about talking. And of course Yoga is going to want to know about guns...they are how you protect yourself, and how you solve the many combat quests in this game.
The person you were qouting was talking about freeing Vic by saving his money and killing Metsger rather then making a deal with a Slaver, something which a lot of people would think twice about doing. And he nor Yoga won't be the first person to solve this game with violence only. I know I have done it in the past.
|
You want me to quote yoga? (besides: I didn't quoted anyone) I§ll quote yoga:
"Yea, that works (the nonviolent solution). But I prefer to spend those 1000$ on guns..."
"only 700 exp.points to level 5. But all geckos are dead. Who to kill to reach 10 000 exp. and level 5?"
"In UW2 I was free to do any action and game is triggered after specific one(s)." (Scatty refered "UW2" as "Ultima Underworld", so I think they are the same series, or at least same kind of game)
"Have I all the game fighting again some ants, scorpions, rats, bats or like or I will meet really human opponents?"
etc.
So yoga DO thinks this is some Diablo-like game with dungeon-crawling, and occasional equipment-retrieving. And if he still thinks it is after a week, I won't stand in his way.
Is it morally questionable freeing Vic with paying? Of course it is. But killing is the same way rejectable idea. Fallout is about morally questionable decisions. It is said to see for me, murder being lesser evil then paying a small sum. (And wasn't the whole situation abut Vic being in debt towards Metzger?)