View Single Post
Old 05-03-2005, 11:58 PM   #29
Dreadlord
[BANNED]

 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 355
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by BeefontheBone+Mar 5 2005, 06:34 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (BeefontheBone @ Mar 5 2005, 06:34 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Morbid_Pathologist@Mar 5 2005, 12:13 PM
rule number 1, a strategy game must NOT be made in a 3d engine, its as simple as that, they all turn out slow, boring, and look terrible.
Pah! What about Total Annihilation, Warzone 2100, Sacrifice, Battlezone (oh what a game that was! - is it abandoned yet?) Black & White and a few others? They all rocked and are 3D. I happen to like WC3, and I'd play WoW all the time if it weren't for the ongoing costs (bah! humbug) and Diablo 2 is indeed dull once you've finished it once in SP (similarly for its mods) but much more fun on battle.net.

I always hated counter-strike too, but I've been playing CS:Source and i actually do like it, although it can be incredibly frustrating when you keep unloading a hole clip into someone only to have them kill you with an incredibly unlikely headshot, from 10 miles away with a teeny pistol. [/b][/quote]
Yeah! Sacrifice! Rocks yes so much! Very much so...
Dreadlord is offline                         Send a private message to Dreadlord
Reply With Quote