:blink:
Sly, did you write this? This one has some good points.
http://www.exchangedlife.com/Creation/macro-evol.shtml
But, genetic data can be added. Insertion and duplication of genetic data is pretty simple genetics. So I am not sure why creationists argue that no genetic data can be added. :blink: This is the first time I've heard this arguement.
Sly, I disagree with you. Molecular genetics has been the testing ground for evolution. If we could not detonate a nuclear bomb, we can still show that we'll get a hell of a bang as long as we prove that nuclear fission or fussion is possible.
Here's a brief explaination of insertion, duplication and deletion. Miss out the review at the top, unreadable. Go to mutations.
http://www.holycross.edu/departments/biolo...o131_Mutate.pdf
With regard to fossil records, yes, that's yet another area where creationists and evolutionists argue. I personally believe we have enough fossil records to show progression, such as in horses.
There are of course gaps which creationists argue.
One thing is sure though. If the earth was 6,000 years old. Then some time between 6,000 years ago and today, the dinosaurs roamed for a significant amount of time, and since they covered the globe, every civilisation would have had to have co-existed with them.
Ancient records from the Egyptians, Chinese, Aztecs, etc would have been talking about dinosaurs all day long.
Certainly, if I was chased by a T.Rex the other week. I would remember to record that whether in normal or religious text! :help: