Go Back   Forums > Community Chatterbox > Blah, blah, blah...
Memberlist Forum Rules Today's Posts
Search Forums:
Click here to use Advanced Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 30-04-2005, 07:20 AM   #32
Evad
Game freak

 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ,
Posts: 106
Default

FROM WHAT I UNDERSTOOD ABOUT THE LAW, IS THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO RUN BEFORE TAKING ACTIONS TO DEFEND YOURSELF. BEFORE, YOU HAD TO SHOW MEASURES TO GET OUT OF THE SITUATION BEFORE RESORTING TO VIOLENCE. sorry bout caps. in other words, if a person mugged you on the street you would have had to run away, or at least try before you could kick the guy in the face. This is a touchy subject, i personally believe a person should be able to act pre-emptively. The way Gov' bush put it if i remember, he basically said he was extending the rights you have in your home to defend your person and belongings, out onto the street. It kinda makes sence. there are way too many laws that restrict victims rights out there. I'm no fan of republicans, or the Bush family, but I don't see the problem of this law.
Evad is offline                         Send a private message to Evad
Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Martial Arts. Evad Blah, blah, blah... 33 13-06-2005 11:29 AM


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump
 


The current time is 05:02 AM (GMT)

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.