«

[omg]

some of that information is out of date. and the way it interprets the data is biased. at the end of the day it is meaningless really. and in no way is it justification for denying homosexuals the right to adopt children. or is it justification for this idea that it can be cured.
a lot of the *treatments* include showing people gay pron while electrocuting them evry time they reach arousel mesured by a **** ring. the male doctor observes.
hmmm. what kind of a doctor is going to want to get a job where he electrocutes a man watching gay pron. hmmmmmmm.
o and i know people who have come through a very nasty time when they were young. major crap at home for them. and there parents were hetrosexual. with gay adoptions we dont mean where one parent leaves and a same sex *Step parent* moves in (step parent scenerios are traumatic regardless) we mean a long term couple who have made the decision at the point when they can afford it. these people go through psych profiling have there financial situation checked out ect. also if it is legal then it means both parents have finacial responsibilitys for the child as well.
the legislation needs to change. surrogates happen for gay parents. but sorting out finacial responsibilitys if one member of a sam sex partnership buggers off is impossible under the current legislation, as they aint meant to be having that kid anyway. but they will do it anyway.