«

[dr_doom]

How is fitting grand theft auto on a handheld without leaving anything off from the console version not innovative? nothing of that size has ever been attempted on a handheld before, and now that it is you guys are saying you would rather play a dog petting simulation? I dont know how many DS games you have actually played, but many, many of them use the touch screen as just a map screen, or an inventory. very few games actually use the touchscreen to its full potential, and those that do just arent my cup of tea (*cough cough* nintendogs)....

As for the graphics arguement, I just have one inquiery: Are you serious? I thought the "It's pretty" point was a last ditch effort made by most modern lacklustre developers.

what do you mean by that? of course i am serious. GTA:LCS actually looks better than GTA 3 did, and burnout legends and ridge racer are almost indistinguishable from some console games. Sure, some of this may be due to the fact that your plaing on a smaller screen, but none of that really matters in the end. If you actually compare a first Gen. psp game to a first Gen. ps2 game, you will be quite surprised . . . .(as in actually buy it and look. You and i both know that screenshots just dont do a game justice)

But you are correct there. Glad you see my side of the debate.

hahaha. very funny. you wish the DS had better features. unfortunately, it doest.

Games - i suppose thats opinion but i really enjoy almost all of the psp's games
graphics - the ds isnt even comparable. thats like comparing a N64 to a ps2
looks - sure, it may not be important but we all know that the psp is just SEXY
features- i would go with good graphics,movies,music,pictures,and,internet over just games anyday. we all know that the touch screen is a cheap gimmick anyways
battery life - owww! the psp's achilles heel. the DS owns in this category.

psp - 4 DS- 1


i am not saying the ds is horrible, just for what i am looking for the psp is definettly the way to go