«

[Japo]

We can't help you, look somewhere else. Repeating, we cannot help you, look somewhere else. Do you copy? Over.

[The Fifth Horseman]

Look in the Emule network.

[Docktor Worm]

the weirdest thing happened, my colony ship died exactly the same time I killed a Daktakblaktak, and it didn't end the game, I could just play with no colony ship

hey how do u get sound for it :wallbash:

[The Fifth Horseman]

<_<
DosBox.

[Japo]

EDIT: Never mind.

i dont get any menu what is the problem my revoluition dont matter

[The Fifth Horseman]

Your problem description is insufficient for us to provide a proper answer.

Please answer the following questions:
1. What operating system do you have?
2. What did you exactly do in to run the game?
3. What is the exact problem?

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(the_fifth_horseman @ Jun 19 2007, 11:07 AM) [snapback]295144[/snapback]</div>

Your problem description is insufficient for us to provide a proper answer.

Please answer the following questions:
1. What operating system do you have?
2. What did you exactly do in to run the game?
3. What is the exact problem?
[/b]

i know the problem already but thanks

[4u3u]

After reading game review and this thread, all I have to say is: Oh, come on!
While I understand that any sequel (and not just in computer games) that dumps something from previous parts and/or introduces something new can disappoint devoted series fan, but come on people! SC3 as standalone game deserves solid 4!

And by the way as somebody who started with SC3 back then and just recently tried to play SC2 I'd give SC3 more points than SC2.

Yeah, intra-starsystem navigation in SC2 is kinda cool as well as resource hunt... but just for the first hour. Then it becomes just plain boring. Another thing I didn't get in SC2 is why the hell HyperSpace has friction?!

So after several hours of resource hunt/random encounters/not much else happening I just gave up. Maybe later I'll give SC2 another try.

Oh, and to somebody in this thread: you can't say "it's rip off [of previous game in series]" and then judge the game as being part of series. It's either part of series and then there can't be any rip off (it's a series for christ sake) or it is separate game and then you have to understand that it doesn't have to follow predecessors.

All above is strictly IMO and is not intended to start any holy wars. It's just an attempt to provide another point of view on the subject. I was just really disapponted to see such a dismissive review (and bashing in this thread) of a game I've had great experience with.