«

[12turtle12]

if you are a member of NMA, what is your username? (PM me if you don't feel comfortable in this public setting) - and we'll continue our flame war there as I am a member of quite a few Fallout-related sites.

This *is* getting a bit out of hand....

edit - "FO2 is pretty much only saved by its gameplay and the fact that the writing wasn't bad at all, there were still as many choices (more). Hell FO2 was better conceptually, but at the end it doesn't satisfy like FO1."
- I guess I misunderstood. My apologies.

"everyone is filled with complete nonsense about NMA like all they ever do is rage about FO3. They don't, you'll only see that in the news sections and in the news comments, and even then they're completely clearheaded about it."
-They don't just rage about FO3? .... ..... ....... ok. Site is over-moderated, removing objectionable comments in news sections to The Vats. Clearheaded? Rage? ... BP, listen to yourself, buddy.....anyway, see you @ NMA if you want.

and NMA is *only* older if you don't count Jay's original source @ turngray.com/fallout (now defunct)

edit # 163234 - heck, just read the wikia article and link around if need be

[Blood-Pigggy]

Originally Posted by cazgotsaved

if you are a member of NMA, what is your username? (PM me if you don't feel comfortable in this public setting) - and we'll continue our flame war there as I am a member of quite a few Fallout-related sites.

This *is* getting a bit out of hand....

edit - "FO2 is pretty much only saved by its gameplay and the fact that the writing wasn't bad at all, there were still as many choices (more). Hell FO2 was better conceptually, but at the end it doesn't satisfy like FO1."
- I guess I misunderstood. My apologies.

"everyone is filled with complete nonsense about NMA like all they ever do is rage about FO3. They don't, you'll only see that in the news sections and in the news comments, and even then they're completely clearheaded about it."
-They don't just rage about FO3? .... ..... ....... ok. Site is over-moderated, removing objectionable comments in news sections to The Vats. Clearheaded? Rage? ... BP, listen to yourself, buddy.....anyway, see you @ NMA if you want.

and NMA is *only* older if you don't count Jay's original source @ turngray.com/fallout (now defunct)

edit # 163234 - heck, just read the wikia article and link around if need be

It's the name same as my Last.FM account, and Wikia is about as reliable as Wikipedia which is not a lot at all.

[12turtle12]

fact, though - those critics that have come against wikipedia have found that it's about as reliable as "paper" encylopedias - and more frequently updated, and objectionable/false content is usually removed quite quickly.

[dosraider]

Fact:
The more peeps the more 'truth'.
The only truth is findable in the Bible.
Oh wait, was it in the Coran?
Oh no, it was in the Torah.
Oh noes, it was in a crummy list on teh intahnet.

Yeah yeah, sure.

[I LOVE NEDDA H]

Originally Posted by dosraider

Fact:
The more peeps the more 'truth'.
The only truth is findable in the Bible.
Oh wait, was it in the Coran?
Oh no, it was in the Torah.
Oh noes, it was in a crummy list on teh intahnet.

Yeah yeah, sure.

but at least you are for real, and not just a living instrumentalist product of education...

[Blood-Pigggy]

Originally Posted by cazgotsaved

fact, though - those critics that have come against wikipedia have found that it's about as reliable as "paper" encylopedias - and more frequently updated, and objectionable/false content is usually removed quite quickly.

Objectionable/false content based on guidelines and edited by people who are just as moronic as the people who put those objectionable/false comments on in the first place.

Paper encyclopedias are useless unless they are from a certain encyclopedia publisher. Wikipedia is editable by anyone. It's a piece of crap. %90 of the information is unreliable junk ripped from some other site/place with unreliable junk.
Internet rumors and worthless facts abound. The administrators always joust away relevant and important content just because it doesn't fit into their minute guidelines.

Wikipedia is horrendous face it, the HP Lovecraft section is absolutely painful to read in its inaccuracy (with all the pointless urban legends and such purported as fact).

It's run by human beings on the internet. And we all know how the majority of those people are idiots.

Hell, I made a joke edit of some random album page a year ago on there and it's STILL there, just because I made it subtle. It wasn't that subtle though, which just proves that Wikipedia is controlled by subhuman knuckleheads.

[Kugerfang]

Well, it's free and thats good.

[I LOVE NEDDA H]

quintop good one .. get angry too lol
no but seriously the games you mentioned all had lame stories, and monkey island was funny but seriously, even though call it a good story come on
the only really cool story had the immortal...
even shinobi had a better story than all that games, i mean terrorizing the whole world to regain the glory and honor of past times that rocks man
its like destroying the world for neda or for my company .....
damn i wish i could remember all the great stories but the immortal seriously had the best story and btw come on system shock was only riding the high tech computer cyber futuristic hype of that time...
hey how come nobody talks about the gimmicks in games, how cool was that sequense in star trail 2 were you read nobody has escaped the path of death and unfortunately you neither