Go Back   Forums > Community Chatterbox > Blah, blah, blah...
Memberlist Forum Rules Today's Posts
Search Forums:
Click here to use Advanced Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-02-2017, 02:20 PM   #6
nighthawk86
Newbie

 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: ,
Posts: 9
Default

I see your points. But I still think that thay should try to stick to quality software, put more effort into obtaining more oldies and focus less on stuffing the site full of indieware. I bet very little of that is bought anyway. In my opinion they should stick to the course they set from the beginning.

Also when buying old DOS titles I really wish gog could offer original disk images for download. If games are after xx number of years taken out of abandonware status, and sold as retail don't we deserve to own the proper images? What source do they use for their releases? Abandonware sites? I have seen DOS games sold, that are not up to their latest version.

And often I see a games Manual listed as "Bonus content". That is bad practice. A manual is an expected part of the game.

These are just my thoughts. GOG does nice work in general and has made fixes to get a lot of older windows titles to run, which I am grateful for.
nighthawk86 is offline                         Send a private message to nighthawk86
Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What Is Ripped? Vip Content? caffeine Old Suggestions 9 22-11-2005 07:29 PM
The Difference Batween Phpbb I Yabbse? Unknown Hero Tech Corner 18 16-12-2004 02:48 PM


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump
 


The current time is 12:39 PM (GMT)

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.