«

[yoga]

Originally Posted by Smiling Spectre

Wow. 256 colors? Really?

Yoga, I believe, you would be much better with True color jpg/85% compression.

Dearest and dorogoy SS,

Please be advised that when AB member attaches some pictures there are limits about volume about 195 KB or like. This is the reason my pic bad quality.
Trying to show more material i have to reduce quality, sorry.

[Japo]

There are so many quests and locations in Skyrim... And the writing is quite good imo.

Originally Posted by yoga

Please be advised that when AB member attaches some pictures there are limits about volume about 195 KB or like. This is the reason my pic bad quality.
Trying to show more material i have to reduce quality, sorry.

I think Spectre means that for this kind of image there are more efficient formats to downsize, to the same size and better quality.

I'd agree with Spectre, not sure about your experience, whether you have tried to downsize the same screenshot also in jpg and compare sizes and qualities...

https://www.diffen.com/difference/JPEG_vs_PNG

JPEGs are used for large images, like photos or big, graphic-heavy website backgrounds, as JPEG's lossy nature allows for smaller file sizes, meaning websites can load designs faster. [...] Though PNGs will never result in a smaller file size than JPEGs will when it comes to large images with complex scenes, PNG's lossless compression does sometimes result in a smaller file size for smaller images, particularly those that have [flat-colored] computer generated graphics