«

[Sly]

Originally posted by Yobor@Mar 24 2005, 08:43 AM
In short, not to be mean, you insult me greatly, almost as if you had slapped me in the face.

Sorry if you felt insulted. That was not my intent. Let's please keep this a mature discussion as we both know we can do. Please re-read my post and logically think about it, that evolution is relying on the unseen, exactly as christianity is. Last time I checked it is still called the evolutionary theory. Of course you are allowed to believe a theory if you want to. Heck, I do, but a different theory. But a theory is not a fact. I admit mine is not fact because I cannot prove it entirely, though I have evidence to support it. And evolution has "evidence" to support its theory, but no one can prove it entirely. Trust me, I've looked into both heavily. I used to believe in evolution myself. But when you put evolution under the microscope of real science and logic it looks just as hokey and illogical as my religion may seem to you. I'll elaborate further on my rebuttal.

But I feel you need to look at both sides of the issue before making very generalized statements "disproving" the "myth" of the flood. It could be taken very arrogantly (and insulting to me, even though I didn't mention it) that you knew what you were talking about in your paper regarding the biblical account of the flood, but you obvisouly did not have the biblical events right. "This myth cleary states...etc"

All I was doing was showing you that you had the biblical account of events incorrectly represented on your paper.

I will give a rebuttal to your questions on your above post later this evening.